Legal Opinion

Application of Ralph E. Miegel and John J. Verbanc

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 5, 1968No. Patent Appeal 8011Published

1Opinion of the Court

404 F.2d 378

Application of Ralph E. MIEGEL and John J. Verbanc.

Patent Appeal No. 8011.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

December 5, 1968.

William B. Cridlin, Jr., Wilmington, Del. (James T. Corle, Wilmington, Del., of counsel), for appellants.

Joseph Schimmel, Washington, D. C. (Jack E. Armore, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, SMITH, ALMOND and BALDWIN, Judges.

ALMOND, Judge.

1

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claim 3, the only claim in appellants' application.1

2

App…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Application of Arthur D. Lohr and Harold M. SpurlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of Douglas H. MoretonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  3. Application of Helen M. Krazinski, Robert G. Shepherd and William E. TaftCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  4. Application of William F. WetterauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  5. In re CrounseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API