Legal Opinion
La Pier v. Deyo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 29, 1984PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Harvey, J.), entered April 14, 1983 in Clinton County which, inter alia, denied defendant Ernest Deyo’s cross motion for summary judgment. UThe instant action stems from Ernest Deyo’s failure to disqualify himself in a suit brought before him as Beekmantown Town Justice by his brother, Rufus Deyo, against the instant plaintiff for work allegedly done for plaintiff by Rufus Deyo’s car dealership. Plaintiff sued both Deyo brothers. His amended complaint states that Rufus Deyo abused judicial process by suing plaintiff in his brother’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lanzi v. BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Oakley v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Sassower v. FinnertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Casterella v. CasterellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lombardoni v. BoccaccioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Mullen v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Mickens v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2009
- Harley v. PerkinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1990
- Harley v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.