Lanzi v. Brooks
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division is affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum decision of that court, with an additional observation. Plaintiff’s complaint did not allege either a present intent not to carry out the promises of future action, or, in fact, any factual assertions from which this conclusion can be drawn, and thus failed to state a cause of action for fraud based on a misstatement of future intentions (cf. Sabo v Delman, 3 NY2d 155). This failure to allege a necessary element of the cause of action, however, is not to be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sabo v. DelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Jered Contracting Corp. v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
3Cited by239 opinions
- Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. WildensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Brown v. LockwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Pludeman v. NORTHERN LEASINGNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Meese v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Caprer v. NussbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
234 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.