Legal Opinion
Mickens v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided May 26, 2009No. Claim No. 114719PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Judith A. Hard, J.
Claimant Tyrone Mickens is one of many former prisoners who was required to serve a term of postrelease supervision (PRS) that had been imposed by the Department of Correctional Services (DOCS) rather than by the court when he was sentenced following his criminal conviction. He commenced this action based on allegations of false imprisonment and violation of his civil rights and now moves for summary judgment in his favor on the issue of liability, on the principles of res judicata, relying on a Supreme Court decision that held DOCS’ action in imposing a…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. SelikoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. CatuNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Collins v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Barrington v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Hardy v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- D'Alessandro v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024