Harris v. Frank
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Clay Distriet Court. The plaintiff in error, Harris, asks for the reversal of certain orders made by the district court, at the May Term, 1882, refusing to set aside a certain execution and sheriff’s sale, and confirming the same. All necessary facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
On May 11, 1877, in an action then pending in the district court of Clay county, ‘wherein Luther *201Hall, who was doing business in the name of L. Hall & Co., was plaintiff, and R. T. Carr, John S. Harris, J. M. Frank and G. Kuhnle were defendants, the plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendants Carr and Harris as principals and Frank and Kuhnle as sureties, for the sum of $662.80. On June 22, 1877, Frank and Kuhnle paid the judgment, but did.not file any formal notice of payment or of a claim to contribution or repayment, as they…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Williams v. RiehlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Kinkel v. ChaseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- Tompkins v. PowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Gilmore v. State National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Honce v. SchramSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.