Legal Opinion

United States v. Pearson

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided June 30, 1982No. NMCM 81 1258PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLADIS, Senior Judge:

Charged with unpremeditated murder, the accused was convicted, contrary to his pleas, by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of negligent homicide and sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for one year, total forfeitures, and reduction to pay grade E-l. The accused assigns ten errors. We find merit in none, but discuss several assignments.

II

THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY DENYING THE APPELLANT’S REQUEST FOR THE EMPLOYMENT OF AN EXPERT BECAUSE (A) SECTION 3006A(e) OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e) APPLIES TO…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. MamaluyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  2. State v. TatumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. United States v. BrowndUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  4. United States v. WoodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  5. United States v. BobergUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. PearsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  2. United States v. YarboroughU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API