United States v. Brownd
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Chief Judge:
In this case the petitioner calls upon us to review the convening authority’s exercise of discretion in deferring sentence to confinement under Article 57(d), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 857(d). We *339find that in this instance the convening authority did abuse his discretion. The standard set forth below is the criteria for judging a convening authority’s future determination of a sentence deferment request.
The salient facts are not in dispute. Included in the appellant’s sentence, following his general court-martial conviction, was…
2Cited by62 opinions
- United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. EzellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. SloanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- Moore v. AkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.