United States v. Yarborough
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
KUCERA, Judge:
The appellant was convicted by a general court-martial of unlawful entry and indecent assault, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1976). The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for two years, total forfeitures, and reduction to the grade of Private E-l.
I
The first assignment of error mandates a lengthy exposition of facts leading up to the appellant’s present contention that the military judge abused his discretion by denying the defense an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. TippitUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. CottenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. YarboroughUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
- United States v. KlingensmithU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. AdamsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. InmanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985