Legal Opinion

United States v. Yarborough

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 30, 1982No. CM 442223PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

KUCERA, Judge:

The appellant was convicted by a general court-martial of unlawful entry and indecent assault, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1976). The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for two years, total forfeitures, and reduction to the grade of Private E-l.

I

The first assignment of error mandates a lengthy exposition of facts leading up to the appellant’s present contention that the military judge abused his discretion by denying the defense an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  4. United States v. TippitUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  5. United States v. CottenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. YarboroughUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  2. United States v. KlingensmithU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  3. United States v. AdamsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. InmanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API