Legal Opinion
Pipes v. Hilderbrand
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 29, 1952No. Civ. 4395PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
Petitioners (general contractors) seek a writ of mandate to compel respondent A. L. Hilderbrand, as Commissioner of Finance of the City of Fresno, to forthwith draw his purchase order and warrant for the first installment payment on a contract for the erection of two prefabricated all metal aircraft hangar buildings at the Fresno Air Terminal for the city of Fresno. The contract, in writing, was executed by petitioners and the city on the 27th of March, 1952, and except as herein noted, the regularity and legality of the proceedings prior to its execution are not questioned. On April 1, 1952,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- City of Oakland v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Krenwinkle v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Roseville v. TulleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Frostburg v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- City & County of San Francisco v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Gas v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Dillard v. YeldellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Rathbun v. City of SalinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.