Legal Opinion
City of Roseville v. Tulley
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 19, 1942No. Civ. 6776PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.
Petitioners filed a petition in the court below seeking a writ of mandate to compel the city treasurer of the city of Roseville to approve and pay warrants approved by the city council of the city of Rose-ville, for the expenses of two city councilmen, the city clerk and the city attorney, as delegates to the annual conference of the League of California Cities, held at San Diego in September, 1940. The petition alleged that the city of Rose-ville is a charter city; that its city council had, at a regular meeting on August 14, 1940, authorized the payment of the expenses…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Green v. FrazierSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- People ex rel. Detroit & Howell Railroad v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Glendale v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- City of Phoenix v. MichaelArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Fickeisen v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Barry v. Phoenix Union High SchoolArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Pipes v. HilderbrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.