Legal Opinion
City of Oakland v. Williams
California Supreme Court
Decided January 30, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 13079PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
Petition for a writ of mandamus to compel Harry GL Williams, as the auditor of the City of Oakland, county of Alameda, to certify that there remained unexpended and unapplied a balance of an appropriated fund applicable to pay the estimated expense of a certain contract, according to the freeholders’ charter of the city of Oakland, section 131, awarded by the board of port commissioners of the City of Oakland to the J. Gr. Wilson Corporation for furnishing rolling steel door supplies proposed to be used in the construction of a warehouse which said board of port commissioners had contracted…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Green v. FrazierSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- People ex rel. Detroit & Howell Railroad v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Matter of Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- City of Oakland v. Oakland RaidersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Irwin v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- City & County of San Francisco v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.