Avocent Redmond Corp. v. United States

*725 OPINION AND ORDER

LAWRENCE S. MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.

On July 18, 2008, plaintiff filed a Motion to Strike Rose Electronics’ (“Rose”) Answer and Defenses pursuant to Rule 12(f) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion is GRANTED, in paid;, and DENIED, in part.

Plaintiff requests Rose’s Answer and Defenses to be stricken in its entirety. Plaintiff offers no explanation for seeking to strike the pleading in its entirety, and the Court will not grant this request. The four sections for which plaintiff offers a detailed…