Legal Opinion

Reininger v. Eldon Manufacturing Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1952No. Civ. 19017PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

This is an action brought by sellers for the balance due on a sales contract. Contending the products delivered were of such poor quality as to be useless the buyer-defendant counterclaimed and also filed a cross-complaint seeking damages. Judgment was entered for plaintiffs for the balance due and against defendant on the cross-complaint. Defendant appeals.

The sole question presented on this appeal, which is on the judgment roll alone, is whether a buyer who keeps the goods. delivered under a sales contract but promptly notifies the seller that goods delivered are defective may maintain an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Mfg. Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  2. Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Whitfield v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. McLaughlin v. KnoblochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Peek v. SteinbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Brookhaven Manor Water Co., Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  3. Reed v. BungerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  4. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. White v. Uniroyal, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API