Legal Opinion
Shaeffer v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 8, 1970No. Civ. 12130PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REGAN, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action in inverse condemnation against the state for water damage to real property suffered in 1967, allegedly resulting from acts of the state in connection with the Sacramento River Flood Control Project, dredger tailings, and the Oroville Dam. The trial court sustained the state’s general demurrer without leave to amend. Plaintiffs appeal from the ensuing judgment of dismissal, contending the general demurrer should have been overruled.
The question presented is whether the complaint states a cause of action in inverse condemnation under article I,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
- Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Zumbrun v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Friedland v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Munoz v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Marina Tenants Ass'n v. Deauville Marina Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.