Legal Opinion

Isaac v. Donegal & Conoy Mutual Fire Ins.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1930No. Appeal, 81PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Appellees instituted an action to recover loss due to the destruction by fire of a building, stock of goods, furniture and fixtures. The insurance policy contained the standard appraisal provision to determine the loss. From a judgment for the insured, the case comes to us mainly because of alleged trial errors.

The adjuster who acted on behalf of the insurer attempted to prove by his testimony his authority from the company to execute the appraisal agreement offered in defense. The insured objected to his evidence, and the court below refused to receive it, on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Matter of FletcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Curran v. National Life Insurance Co. of the United StatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Bashford v. West Miami Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Bunting v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. Int. L. G. W. U.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Goldstein v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Kimble v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Patriotic Order Sons of America Hall Ass'n v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Turner Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API