Legal Opinion
Sukonik v. Shapiro
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 6, 1939No. Appeal, 367PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Stern,
The parties herein, partners in business, submitted their disputes to a committee of 'three arbitrators, only two of whom signed the award (in the sum of $18,233.30) in favor of plaintiff. For that reason defendant resisted payment, and now appeals from a directed verdict against him.in a suit brought oh the award. .
Thé Act of April, 25, 1927, P. L. 381, section 8, provides: “The award shall be in writing and shall be signed by the arbitrators, or a majority of them. . . . If there be more than one arbitrator, an award shall require the concurrence of a majority of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Goldstein v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Isaac v. Donegal & Conoy Mutual Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Wagner v. MarcusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- J. M. Davis Co. v. Shaler TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Runewicz v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- National Tea Co. v. RichmondSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- JA Robbins Co., Inc. v. Airportels, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Rosenbaum v. DruckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Povey v. the Midvale Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.