Crawford v. Duluth St. Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtAlschuler, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The receiver in custody of the street railway property applied to the court for authority to abandon service on certain branch lines and to substitute bus service therefor. His showing, whieh is conceded on this appeal, is that the actual operating expenses of those branch lines exceeded their earnings; and that, under existing circumstances, it is impossible to operate them so as to cover expenses. He further showed that, if operations are continued on the branches, the whole system will be operated at a loss. It is not possible, without depleting the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brooks-Scanlon Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of La.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Eastern Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Bullock v. Florida Ex Rel. Railroad Comm'n of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Broad River Power Co. v. South Carolina Ex Rel. DanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Calumet Service Co. v. City of ChiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Chicago Rapid Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- Hessey v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- Converse v. Commonwealth of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Murray v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.