Legal Opinion
Murray v. Roberts
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 17, 1939No. 198PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
These appeals are from an order, entered in a general creditors’ suit, which directed the receiver of the Interborough *891Rapid Transit Company to reject a lease, granted by the Manhattan Railway Company of its elevated railroad in the City of New York; but to continue to operate trains over parts of the Interborough tracks, connecting with the Manhattan; and to give free transfers at one intersection of the two roads. The order also directed the receiver to affirm three contracts — Nos. 1, 2 & 3' — between the Inter-borough and the City, and denied the petition of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co. v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- The People v. . the Albany and Vermont Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Bullock v. Florida Ex Rel. Railroad Comm'n of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Broad River Power Co. v. South Carolina Ex Rel. DanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Paige v. . Schenectady Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wallace v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & FlomDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re Chicago Rapid Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- In Re New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1943
- American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Berenger v. GottliebCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.