Legal Opinion
Broad River Power Co. v. South Carolina Ex Rel. Daniel
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 26, 1930No. 528PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
This case is here on certiorari, 280 U. S. 551, to review a judgment of the Supreme Court of South Carolina, adjudging the petitioners, the Broad River Power Company and its subsidiary, the Columbia Railway Gas & Electric Company, to be jointly responsible for the operation of an electric street railway system, in Columbia, South Carolina, and directing them to resume its operation, which they had abandoned. The proceeding, in the nature of mandamus, was brought in the state Supreme Court to compel the operation of the system by petitioners. By their answer they set up that the railway was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Ward v. Board of Commr's of Love Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Fertilizing Co. v. Hyde ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Blair v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Thomas Garcia v. Hazel Lewis, Superintendent, Hale Creek Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Patterson v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.