Legal Opinion

O'Connell v. New York Life Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The evidence is not in dispute. Thomas O'Connell was a plumber. On July 12, 1932, he was working on the construction of a sewer in Chippewa Falls. His *63work consisted of laying the sewer pipe. The trench in which the sewer was laid was eight feet deep and approximately three feet wide. The temperature was about one hundred and ten degrees. The air was muggy and close. After some hours of. work in this ditch, O’Connell returned to the plumbing shop and shortly thereafter collapsed and fell, striking his head at the base of the skull. Within twenty-four hours he developed pneumonia from which he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Fox Wisconsin Corp. v. Century Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Wiger v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Fehrer v. Midland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zinn v. Equitable Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Herthel v. Time Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Raley v. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of TennesseeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Bukata v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Jacobson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API