Legal Opinion

City of Pasadena v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 12493PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petitioner filed in this court an original application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to settle a proposed bill of exceptions, preparatory to an appeal from a judgment of dismissal.

The facts, as set forth in the verified petition, are admitted by respondent, and are as follows:

The City of Pasadena, petitioner herein, commenced an action in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, for-the purpose of condemning certain parcels of real property in accordance with several ordinances of the city ordering the construction of a proposed improvement. This action will…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Alley v. NottSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Goldtree v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Green v. DuvergeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. McDonough Power Equipment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Adams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API