Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1995No. 94API11-1688PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John C. Young, Judge.

On December 4, 1992, William Smith, appellant, filed a complaint in the Ohio Court of Claims against the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

(“ODRC”), the Governor of Ohio, and various individuals at the Orient Correctional Institution (“OCI”) alleging that he had been discriminated against because he and other blind inmates were not provided with Braille classes and other services suited for the blind inmates. ODRC filed a motion to dismiss appellant’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Reynolds v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. SkaggsOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Perotti v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. MaginnOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Littleton v. Holmes Siding Contr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. National Coalition for Students with Disabilities Education & Legal Defense Fund v. AllenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
  4. NAT. COAL. DISABILITIES ED & LEGAL DEFENSE v. AllenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API