Legal Opinion
Dmm v. Dfh
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1998No. C-97-1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Justice.
DMM (Father) appeals from a district court order denying his motion for relief from a default judgment which established paternity and directed the payment of child support. We affirm and award attorney fees to DFH (Mother).
ISSUES
Father, as appellant, presents four issues:
1. Is there a requirement for an Informal Hearing in a paternity proceeding when a default is issued against the putative father?
2. Is there a requirement for an evidentia-ry hearing to be held in a paternity proceeding when a default has been entered against a putative father?
3. Is there a requirement for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of Paternity of JRWWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Matter of TRGWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Trl by Avery v. RlpWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- JW v. State Ex Rel. Laramie County Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Phifer v. PhiferWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barnes v. BarnesWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Exotex Corp. v. RinehartWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Teton Builders v. Jacobsen Construction Co. ex rel. FS Jackson Hole Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Exotex Corp. v. RinehartWyoming Supreme Court · 2000