Legal Opinion

Teton Builders v. Jacobsen Construction Co. ex rel. FS Jackson Hole Development Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2004No. 03-230PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

[¶ 1] This is an appeal from the district court order refusing to reopen a matter involving the validity of a construction lien. In particular, appellant Teton Builders contends that it was not afforded due process with respect to the hearing regarding appellee Jacobsen Construction’s petition to strike and release Teton Builders’ lien. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] Teton Builders sets forth the issue on appeal as:

Whether the district court erred in refusing to reopen a judgment under Rule 60(b)(4) of the Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure for denial of due process when the judgment was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Eugene R. Orner v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,779 in Re Four Seasons Securities Laws Litigation. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  3. In Interest of FHNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Throndset v. HawkensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Sandstrom v. SandstromWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jacobsen Const. Co., Inc. v. Teton BuildersUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Rocio Esmeralda Mercado Soto Linch v. Ronald B. LinchWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In the Matter of the Guardianship of Mkh, Minor Child. Brenda Clark v. Aaron HufferWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In the Matter of the Guardianship of Mkh, Minor Child. Brenda Clark v. Aaron HufferWyoming Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API