Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Donovan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 23, 1983No. Nos. 81-7653, 82-7149PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners, Brooks and Rankin, seek review of the decision of the Secretary of Labor denying them pension accruals under the provisions of the Redwood Employee Protection Program after they withdrew their pensions from their employer's private pension funds. We uphold the Secretary’s decision.
FACTS
Congress planned to expand Redwood National Park, but was concerned that workers in the area of potential expansion might lose their jobs. To prevent hardship, Congress enacted the Redwood Employee Protection Program, Pub.L. No. 95-250, 92 Stat. 172 (1978), §§ 201-213 (REPP).…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation and Hawaiian Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- William F. Lanning v. Honorable Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Hughes Air Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Don S. Noble v. Honorable Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
3Cited by32 opinions
- Trilles v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000
- Albertson's, Inc., Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Emery Worldwide Airlines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Booth v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997
- Faust v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.