Legal Opinion
Fuentes v. TMCSF, Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided August 23, 2018No. E066242PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRamirez, P. J.
Plaintiff Alfredo Fuentes entered into a written agreement with defendant TMCSF, Inc., doing business as Riverside Harley-Davidson (Riverside), to buy a motorcycle. At the same time, he entered into a written agreement with Eaglemark Savings Bank (Eaglemark) to finance the purchase. The latter agreement included an arbitration clause; the former agreement did not.
Fuentes then filed this action against Riverside, alleging that Riverside made various misrepresentations and violated various statutes in connection with the sale of the motorcycle. Riverside petitioned to compel arbitration. The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
- McCarthy v. AzureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Murphy v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Ballesteros v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2025
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes etc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Davis v. Nissan North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2024
- Hicks v. Utiliquest, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.