Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Utiliquest, LLC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 11, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00911Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT HICKS, an individual, and on No. 2:24-cv-00911-DJC-AC 12 behalf of others similarly situated and aggrieved, 13 14 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 15 v. 16 UTILIQUEST, LLC, a Georgia Limited Liability Company; DYCOM 17 INDUSTRIES, INC., a Florida 18 corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 Plaintiff Robert Hicks brings a putative class action complaint against Utiliquest, 23 LLC and Dycom Industries, Inc., along with 50 Doe Defendants…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API