Legal Opinion
Dillman v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 23, 1962No. Civ. 26273PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioners Ralph A. Dillman and Harriet W. Dillman seek a writ of mandate, pursuant to section 400 of the Code of Civil Procedure, directing the trial court to set aside an order made on March 7, 1962, granting a motion for change of venue from the County of Los Angeles to the County of Santa Barbara, and to compel respondent court to retain venue.
On December 5, 1961, petitioners, as plaintiffs, filed an action in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles seeking damages for the death of their daughter Mary Kay Dillman who, it is alleged, died as a result of ingesting a drug…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Goossen v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Hellman v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- San Jose Hospital v. EthertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- County of San Bernardino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- La Mirada Cmty. Hosp. v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Stute v. BurindaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1981
- La Mirada Cmty. Hosp. v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1967