Haines v. Parra
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
1
Kay Parra appeals, in propria persona, from a summary judgment entered in favor of respondent, Lloyd M. Haines, in his action against her for conversion. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
On November 9, 1982, Haines filed a complaint against Parra for conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, conspiracy to commit conversion and money had and received. Haines alleged that on or about December 14, 1980, Parra maliciously and fraudulently converted $4,000 of his money to her own use and that although he had demanded return of the money, she had failed and refused to return…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Mutual of Omaha Insurance v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schuldies v. MillarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. LaytonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Harwood State Bank v. CharonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Broadwater v. Old Republic SuretyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Gladstone v. HillelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.