Legal Opinion
McAuley v. Morris Plan Bank
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided January 15, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, C. J.
*780The essential facts necessary for an understanding óf the contentions made and the questions of law raised by this record are these:
The plaintiff, Essie McAuley, agreed to buy an automobile from D. Major—supposed to be an automobile salesman—for $1,675. She gave Major a check for $150, drawn by her husband on State-Planters Bank and Trust Company, as an earnest of the purchase price. Major opened an account with the Richmond Trust Company by depositing the check with that bank. On the same date, which was Friday, November 18th, her husband went to the Morris Plan Bank of Virginia, the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- In re State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Raynor v. Scandinavian-American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Ayres v. Farmers & Merchants BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Central National Bank v. First & Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
- Ledwell v. Shenandoah Milling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State Planters Bank v. Courtesy Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Bank of America v. Universal Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Holt v. First State Bank of MiamiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.