Legal Opinion
In re Gentile
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 29, 1998No. 97-BG-79PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent, James D. Gentile, an attorney, was suspended from the practice of law in the state of Maryland for thirty days by consent. According to the Joint Petition for Suspension filed with the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (Commission), four complaints were filed against Gentile alleging violations of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3 (acting with reasonable diligence and promptness), 1.4 (keeping a client reasonably informed about the - status of a matter) and 1.15 (safekeeping property).1 Prior to a hearing on the complaints, Gentile consented to a thirty-day…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re GardnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re DietzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In re GeorgeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999