List v. Republic Bond & Mortgage Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BUCK (G. F.), P. J., pro tem.
Action hy plaintiff, a licensed broker’s agent, to recover from defendant corporation the sum of $16,000 claimed as commissions due plaintiff for services rendered defendant in sale of some of defendant’s capital stock.
The trial was by the court without a jury and the court found that “within two years last past plaintiff performed and rendered services for defendant at the instance and request of defendant, which services were and are of the aggregate and reasonable value of $2,250, no part of which has been paid.” Judgment accordingly was rendered for plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Domenigoni v. Imperial Live Stock & Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Tatterson v. KehrleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Cone v. KeilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Atwater v. A. G. Edwards Brokerage Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McManus v. FultonMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Smith v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Perego v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Silverthorne v. PerceyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932