Legal Opinion

Perego v. Seymour

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1961No. Civ. 19272PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.

Defendant Seymour appeals from a money judgment obtained by plaintiff on the basis that she was en titled to a commission on the sale of certain corporate stock. The appeal of appellant Shore has been dismissed, and all reference herein to “appellant” is to Seymour.

It will be necessary to relate some of the background. Appellant is what may be generally described as a promoter, and respondent is a real estate broker. After this transaction got started, she also applied for and obtained a license as a securities broker.

Marin Can always and Development Co., a California corporation, was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wells v. ComstockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Bourke v. FriskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Duntley v. KagariseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Stonehocker v. CassanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. List v. Republic Bond & Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clejan v. ReismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. N. C. Roberts Co. v. Topaz Transformer Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Southern California First National Bank v. Quincy Cass AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API