Legal Opinion

Silverthorne v. Percey

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1932No. Docket No. 6946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAPPAAN, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered in favor of defendant Jessie B. Percey upon an order sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint without leave to amend.

The facts, which are admitted, are, briefly, as follows: The plaintiff, in the capacity of real estate broker, negotiated a certain exchange of real property between defendant Jessie B. Percey and her husband Sanford D. Percey with Ida P. Cushman and E. H. Cushman. The agreement for the exchange was reduced to written form and duly accepted in conformity to the provisions thereof. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Tatterson v. KehrleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Shortell v. Evans-Ferguson Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Pape v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Joseph Denunzio Fruit Co. v. CraneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  2. Longway v. NewberyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API