Legal Opinion

Princess Plaza Partners v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 12, 1996No. 1 CA-CV 93-0338, 1 CA-CV 93-0570PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MICHAEL D. RYAN, Judge.

The Arizona State Land Department (“the department”) appeals from rulings made by the trial court in a lawsuit concerning a sixty-five-year lease of a 6.72 acre parcel of the state’s school trust land 1 by Princess Plaza Partners (“PPP”). The superior court ruled on summary judgment that the lease, executed six years earlier, had not been made in substantial conformity with the provision of the Enabling Act requiring appraisal of the leasehold and, therefore, that the lease was void ab initio.

The trial court also determined that the parties should be returned to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lassen v. Arizona Ex Rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Alamo Land & Cattle Co. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Murphy v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Schroeder v. HudginsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. HassellArizona Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baier v. Mayer Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. Caruthers v. UnderhillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Raimey v. DitsworthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. In re the Estate of RileyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Northeast Phoenix Holdings, LLC v. WinklemanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API