Legal Opinion
Schroeder v. Hudgins
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 21, 1984No. 2 CA-CIV 4733PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOKS, Presiding Judge.
Appellants, Henry and Jacqueline Schroeder, brought suit against Attorney Richard S. Hudgins and Robertson, Molloy, Fickett & Jones, P.C., the law firm with which Hudgins was associated. The complaint charged that appellees (1) were negligent in the performance of their duties as legal counsel for appellants; and, (2) breached their fiduciary duty toward appellants in continuing to represent them after a conflict of interest arose between their obligations to appellants and those owed to another of the firm’s clients. Appellees moved for summary judgment; the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Christison v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Nicoletti v. Westcor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Green v. Victor Talking MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Arnold v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Picadilly, Inc. v. RaikosIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Roberts v. Holland & HartColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- GM Development Corp. v. Community American Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Kiley v. Jennings, Strouss & SalmonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.