Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Riley
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 9, 2011No. 2 CA-CV 2010-0149PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Appellants R.J. Riley, Regina Riley, F. Martin Riley, Neysa Kalil, Nora Simons, Cecelia Riley, Jude Riley, Loretta LaCorte, and Julia Riley (hereinafter “the objectors”) appeal from the probate court’s order approving a compromise between the personal representative of their mother’s estate, John Barkley, and two of their siblings, Joseph Riley and Mary Benge, as well as a separate compromise between Barkley and their sibling, Kathryn Riley. Because the compromise between Barkley, Joseph, and Mary was not executed by all beneficiaries of the estate, as…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Van Loan v. Van LoanArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Polanco v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Harris v. Cochise Health SystemsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- National Union Indemnity Co. v. Bruce Bros.Arizona Supreme Court · 1934
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilson v. DallasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- In Re the Estate of Mary A. RileyArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- James Brown Irrevocable Trust Agreement v. S Below (In re Estate of Brown)Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019