Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1985No. 84-252PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict awarding the appellants thirty-two thousand dollars ($32,000). Appellants’ appeal raises four issues which are set out in the following fashion:

“I. Did the trial court err when it instructed the jury that the only basis upon which punitive damages could be awarded is upon a finding that appellee was guilty of ‘willful and wanton misconduct’ and refused to allow consideration of punitive damages on the basis of fraud or misrepresentation or oppression or malice?
“II. . Did the trial court err when it instructed the jury…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Elaine B. Fischel, Contemner-Appellant. United States of America v. Harry MargolisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Town of Jackson v. ShawWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. McCabe v. R.A. Manning Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Rouse v. MunroeWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Campen v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. McCullough v. Golden Rule Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Employment Security Commission v. Western Gas Processors, Ltd.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API