Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 1985No. 84-252PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARDINE, Justice.
This appeal is from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict awarding the appellants thirty-two thousand dollars ($32,000). Appellants’ appeal raises four issues which are set out in the following fashion:
“I. Did the trial court err when it instructed the jury that the only basis upon which punitive damages could be awarded is upon a finding that appellee was guilty of ‘willful and wanton misconduct’ and refused to allow consideration of punitive damages on the basis of fraud or misrepresentation or oppression or malice?
“II. . Did the trial court err when it instructed the jury…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In the Matter of Elaine B. Fischel, Contemner-Appellant. United States of America v. Harry MargolisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Town of Jackson v. ShawWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- McCabe v. R.A. Manning Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Rouse v. MunroeWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Campen v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- McCullough v. Golden Rule Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Employment Security Commission v. Western Gas Processors, Ltd.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.