Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Jackson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1963No. 95PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

The first question for decision is: What estate did the grantees named in the Tyson deed of 1905 take? Plaintiffs assert the children of M. H. Jackson and wife, Maggie, took vested remainders and upon the death of their mother, her one-fifth descended to her children, the plaintiffs. Defendants contend the estate which the children of M. H. Jackson and wife, Maggie, took was a contingent remainder vesting only in those who survived their parents.

When the rights of parties are determined by a written instrument, courts seek to determine the intent of the parties by the language they use. Where…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Whitesides v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Story Ex Rel. Story v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  4. Honeycutt v. Citizens National Bank in GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. McCotter v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Peele v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. In Re AndrewsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
  3. Czarnecki v. American Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Blankenship v. PriceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Mason v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API