Legal Opinion

Joyner v. Duncan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 1980No. 33PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

No devise or grant of a future interest in property is valid unless the title thereto must vest in interest, if at all, not later than twenty-one years, plus the period of gestation, after some life or lives in being at the creation of the interest. Parker v. Parker, 252 N.C. 399, 113 S.E. 2d 899 (1960); McPherson v. First & Citizens National Bank of Elizabeth City, 240 N.C. 1, 81 S.E. 2d 386 (1954); McQueen v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 234 N.C. 737, 68 S.E. 2d 831 (1952). For testamentary devises, the period of time prescribed by the rule begins to run at testator’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Elmore v. AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. McPherson v. First & Citizens National Bank of Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Whitley v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Peele v. Wilson County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Adcock v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Brinkley v. DayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Slater v. LineberryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Love v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API