Legal Opinion

Kale v. Forrest

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 1971No. 58PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, Justice

We first consider plaintiff appellant's contention that the trial court erred in determining that the $25,000 used to fund the educational bequest for testator’s granddaughters shall be taken from the one-fourth share of Thomas L. Kale in the estate of Russell Henderson Kale, Sr.

This question involves specifically that portion of testator’s will which states: “. . . $25,000.00 shall be taken from my estate for the college education of daughters of Thomas Kale, Trudy Lee Kale, Teresa Lyn Kale, Tina Louise Kale, Tracey Kale and Taren Leigh Kale. Any moneys not used for their education shall be…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Bowen v. Hackney.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Whitesides v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Witty v. WittySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Joyner v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. First Union National Bank v. MossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. White v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. North Carolina National Bank v. AppleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Pittman v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API