Miller & Lux Inc. v. Pinelli
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, J., pro tem.
In this suit for injunction plaintiff recovered a judgment restraining defendants from permitting their stock to trespass upon his land, and awarding him damages in the sum of $1,000. From this award of damages alone the defendants have appealed, claiming that the findings, in this respect, are not supported by the evidence.
During the years of 1922 and 1923 defendants owned a stock ranch in Merced County, consisting of 640 acres of land, which was entirely surrounded by grazing land belonging to plaintiff, known as the Los Banos farm. The ranches of the respective…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Teller v. Bay and River Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Wheelock v. . NoonanNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. MarleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Pacific Livestock Co. v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Lommeland v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wolfsen v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Rilovich v. RaymondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Staub v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Givens v. MarkallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- White River Sheep Co. v. BarkleyArizona Supreme Court · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.