Legal Opinion

White River Sheep Co. v. Barkley

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1930No. Civil No. 2895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The principal questions presented by this appeal relate to the sufficiency of the evidence and the measure of damages.

The plaintiffs are the lessees from the state of Arizona of ten and one-half sections of unfenced grazing lands, situate in Pinal county and south of Superstition Mountains. These lands are in compact form, two sections deep north and south and respectively five and five and one-half sections long east and west. Upon them grow wild grasses and herbage useful for stock feed. These sections constitute a part of plaintiffs’ cattle range and are more particularly designed and kept…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Central Coal & Coke Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. GelvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  3. Sussex Land & Live Stock Co. v. Midwest Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  4. City of Pueblo v. GriffinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  5. Pacific Livestock Co. v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. CohenArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Coury Bros. Ranches, Inc. v. EllsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Isenberg v. LemonArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Southern Arizona School for Boys, Inc. v. CheryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. ArthurArizona Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API