Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. Marley
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Holt county. Tried below before Norris, J. on filing substituted petition and forcing defendant below to trial, cited :■ Code, Sec. 137. Opinions of witnesses: F., F. & M. V. R. R. v. 'Lamb, 11 Neb., 595. B. & M. R. R. v. Beebe, 14 Neb., 471. B. & M. R. R. v. Sehluntz, 14 Neb., 423. O. & A. R. R. v. U. & K W. R. R., 67 111., 145. G. & R. R. R. v. Ball, 5 Ohio State, 573. Admission of certificate of entry of title: Code, See. 411. Comp.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Holt county. Tried below before Norris, J. on filing substituted petition and forcing defendant below to trial, cited :■ Code, Sec. 137. Opinions of witnesses: F., F. & M. V. R. R. v. 'Lamb, 11 Neb., 595. B. & M. R. R. v. Beebe, 14 Neb., 471. B. & M. R. R. v. Sehluntz, 14 Neb., 423. O. & A. R. R. v. U. & K W. R. R., 67 111., 145. G. & R. R. R. v. Ball, 5 Ohio State, 573. Admission of certificate of entry of title: Code, See. 411. Comp. Stat., Secs. 13, 40, Ch. 73. Interest on damages: Chicago v. Allcock, 86 111., 385. Surface water: Bangor v. Laurel, 51 Me.,…
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, in the district court of Holt ■county, to recover damages to crops, etc. A petition was filed, and also an amended petition, and just before going to trial it was discovered that the files were mislaid, and .after a prolonged search, as they could not be found, the attorneys for the plaintiff below obtained leave to substitute a petition, which they did as follows:
“That defendant is now, and was, at the date of the various transaction's hereinafter mentioned, a railroad cor*141poration organized and doing business…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barkley v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Lincoln v. Saratoga & Schenectady Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1840
- Alabama & Florida R. R. v. BurkettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
- Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. FitzpatrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Adams v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co. v. Peninsular Land, Transportation & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1891
- Fell v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. GrovesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Todd v. York CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.