Legal Opinion

Kierce v. Lumbermen's Insurance Co. of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 13, 1925No. 24,405PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

In this action, brought to recover on a fire insurance policy, the court directed a verdict in plaintiff’s favor and the defendant has appealed.

The policy was issued July 23, 1920, for the term of three years, named the plaintiff as the insured, was in the standard form prescribed by section 3512, G. S. 1923, and covered a house in the city of St. Paul. In describing the property, these words were used: “Occupied, and to be occupied, only for dwelling purposes.” Because a still for the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor was set up in the house by the person to whom plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Collinsville Savings Society v. Boston InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  2. Milliken v. WoodwardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  3. Royal Exch. Assur. v. ThrowerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
  4. Ermentrout v. American Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Union Building Ass'n v. Rockford InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fire Insurance Exchange v. Adamson MotorsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Miller v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  3. Holtorf v. Rochester Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. Langhorne v. Capital Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1942
  5. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. KammererDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API