Legal Opinion

Langhorne v. Capital Fire Insurance

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 2, 1942No. 589 CivilPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

The facts out of which the cause of action arises are essentially these: Plaintiff is the vendor of certain real property under contract for deed which required the vendee, one Christine Peterson, to insure the premises against loss by fire for the benefit of the vendor. The vendee insured the premises in her own name, the policy containing a loss payable clause for the benefit of the vendor as his interest might appear. The policy also contained a “standard” or “union mortgage” clause as follows: “If this policy shall be made payable to a mortgagee of the insured real…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Syndicate Ins. v. BohnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. Magoun v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  3. Clarke & Cohen v. Real Ex Rel. Stroudsburg Nat. BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Kierce v. Lumbermen's Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Kohn v. Fire Association of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Capital Fire Ins. Co. of California v. LanghorneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  2. Reitzner v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Langhorne v. Capital Fire Ins.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1944
  4. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. StaeheliCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API