Ermentrout v. American Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Pond, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
' At the close of the plaintiffs’ case, on the trial of this action in the district court, the defendant moved to dismiss the action, on the ground, among others not here material, that the complaint did not state a cause of action. The motion was granted; plaintiffs excepted; and from an order denying their motion for *419.a new trial this appeal was taken. No question of a defect of parties was raised either by demurrer or answer, and the objection to the complaint was made for the first time upon the trial.
1. The defendant asserts that the complaint does not state a canse of action, because it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Winne v. . Niagara Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Bailey v. MerrittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
- Miles v. WannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Worley v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Palmer Savings Bank v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Atlas Reduction Co. v. New Zealand Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Capital Fire Ins. Co. of California v. LanghorneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Vancouver Nat. Bank v. Law Union & Crown Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1907
- Vaill v. McPhailSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.