Legal Opinion

Holtorf v. Rochester Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 3, 1933No. 29,543PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEVANEY, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff is the owner of a farm in Olmsted county, Minnesota. She is one of that substantial group who make up the “retired farmer” class of this state. Defendant is a farmers mutual fire insurance company organized under state law and performing a valuable and recognized service in this farming community. On May 13, 1929, plaintiff entered into an agreement with defendant, Rochester Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance Company, insuring the buildings located on her farm against loss from fire. The farm was in possession of her son, who was an ordinary tenant. On May 8, 1932,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Coughlin v. Reliance Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Royal Exch. Assur. v. ThrowerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
  4. Schaffer v. Hampton Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Royal Exch. Assurance of London v. ThrowerDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nielsen v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Schmitt v. Eagle Roller Mill Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Continental Western Fire Insurance Co. v. Poly Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Mosley v. Pacific Specialty Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Mosley v. Pacific Specialty Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API