Legal Opinion

Kesterson v. California-Oregon Power Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1924PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

— The plaintiff Kesterson, having lost by fire a sawmill, a large amount of lumber, and sundry buildings used in the operation of the mill, all of which were insured by the other plaintiffs and who have paid the insurance, join with the insurance companies in this action to recover damages which the complaint attributes to the defendant’s negligence in the construction and maintenance of an electric power line of great potency over the premises whereon the lumber was piled. It is said that owing to the negligence of the defendant, one or more of its wires broke, fell upon and set fire to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fendall v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Clayton v. Enterprise Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Wilmot v. McPaddenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  4. Toomey v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Ward v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cook v. KINZUA PINE MILLS CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Amphitheaters, Inc. v. Portland MeadowsOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Minto v. Salem Water, Light & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Western Massachusetts Electric Co. v. Sambo's of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Eugene C. Walsh and Lois M. Walsh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API