Fagan v. Lentz
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing a new trial. James M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. James M. Hanley, and George E. Lawrence, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This action is one in equity to obtain a reconveyance of certain real property conveyed by plaintiff to Ellen T. Fagan, now defendant Ellen T. Lentz. Plaintiff had judgment and defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The real property in suit consists of undivided interests in two lots of land in the city and county of San Francisco, one being a lot on J ones Street of considerable value, and the other being a lot on Sanchez Street. On July 18, 1905, the Jones Street lot was owned by plaintiff, Ellen T. Fagan, and Mary J. Fagan, sisters of plaintiff, and one R. S.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Sheehan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Couts v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sublett v. Henry's Turk & Taylor LunchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Ash v. Soo Sing LungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Conlin v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Southern Pac. Co. v. LibbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Peskin v. SquiresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.